Managerial Dilemmas
Describe how Covey’s principle-centered leadership skills can be used to effectively resolve managerial issues. Briefly, give an example of a managerial issue and how it was resolved in your workplace (you may alter or omit names if you like). Why do you think there was an effective or ineffective resolution based on the outcome of your example? Would you have handled this dilemma in the same way? If not, what would you have done differently?
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
Describe how Covey’s principle-centered leadership skills can be used to effectively resolve managerial issues.
Just from $13/Page
This paper should be approximately 4 pages in length (including the cover page and References).
View Rubric
| Written Assignments (100 pts) | ||
| Written Assignments (100 pts) | ||
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| Relevance 20% | 20 to >18 ptsExceptionalWritten account of the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to student, to assignment requirements, AND overall course goals.18 to >16 ptsAbove AverageWritten account of the learning experience is relevant and meaningful to student, assignment requirements, OR overall course goals.16 to >13 ptsAverageAttempts to demonstrate relevance (to either the student, assignment, OR overall course goals) but the relevance is unclear to the reader.13 to >0 ptsBelow AverageParts of the reflection are not made relevant to the student, assignment requirements, and/or overall course learning goals. | / 20 pts |
| Analysis 20% | 20 to >18 ptsExceptionalMoves beyond simple description to an analysis of how the experience contributed to student’s understanding of self, others, AND course concepts.18 to >16 ptsAbove AverageThe reflection demonstrates student attempts to analyze by addressing understanding of self, others, OR course concepts.16 to >13 ptsAverageAttempts applying the learning to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts but relies primarily on description of concept.13 to >0 ptsBelow AverageReflection does not move beyond description of the learning prompt(s). | / 20 pts |
| Synthesis 25% | 25 to >23 ptsExceptionalThe reflection demonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience; AND/OR personal goals.23 to >21 ptsAbove AverageDemonstrates connections between the experience and material from other courses; past experience; or personal goals.21 to >17 ptsAverageLittle to no attempt to demonstrate connections between the learning experience and previous other personal OR learning experiences.17 to >0 ptsBelow AverageNo attempt to demonstrate connections to previous learning or experience. | / 25 pts |
| Self Reflection 25% | 25 to >23 ptsExceptionalDemonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, assumptions, preconceptions, AND defines new modes of thinking as a result.23 to >21 ptsAbove AverageDemonstrates ability to question biases, stereotypes, and preconceptions.21 to >17 ptsAverageSome attempt at growth mindset thought patterns, but fails to demonstrate awareness of personal biases, etc.17 to >0 ptsBelow AverageNo attempt at growth mindset thought patterns. | / 25 pts |
| Clarity 10% | 10 to >9 ptsExceptionalLanguage is clear and expressive. Abstract concepts are explained accurately. Explanation of concepts could make sense to an uninformed reader.9 to >8 ptsAbove AverageMinor, infrequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors that largely do not interfere with meaning.8 to >6 ptsAverageThere are frequent lapses in clarity and accuracy. Grammatical or mechanical errors may interfere with meaning.6 to >0 ptsBelow AverageGrammatical or mechanical errors result in confusion for reader. Concepts are either omitted or are presented inaccurately. | / 10 pts |
| Total Points:100 |
