A final reflection paper will be required at the end of the semester. This reflection paper should be 3-4 pages and will demonstrate how everything that you have read, discussed, written, experienced, and learned, as well as share your personal insights and self-awareness— how everything has contributed to your developing counselor identity and competency. See the handout for detailed instructions. Handout for Final Reflection Paper
Don't use plagiarized sources. Get Your Custom Essay on
FINAL REFLECTIVE PAPER
Just from $13/Page
View Rubric
| FINAL REFLECTIVE PAPER RUBRIC | ||
|---|---|---|
| Criteria | Ratings | Pts |
| CULTURAL AWARENESS AND COUNSELING IMPLICATIONS | 25 to >23 ptsEXCELLENTPaper shows strong evidence of cultural self-awareness as seen in the depth of thoughts drawing the relationship between the assignment, texts, and/or the class discussions. Clearly articulates and explains how this self-awareness will influence your use of self in the counseling relationship.23 to >22 ptsPROFICIENTPaper shows evidence of cultural self-awareness but doesn’t elaborate. The student doesn’t articulate fully understanding the importance of cultural self-awareness in culturally competent counseling.22 to >19 ptsMARGINALPaper lacks depth of cultural self-awareness; does not expand on thoughts. ● The student doesn’t explain connections between experience(s) and assignment and cultural competence in counseling.19 to >0 ptsUNACCEPTABLEPaper does not acknowledge cultural self-awareness and assumes experiences that prompted growth and learning are implicit throughout the paper. The student can only minimally relate to the importance of cultural self-awareness in culturally competent counseling. | / 25 pts |
| CRITICAL THINKING AND ANALYSISview longer description | 25 to >23 ptsEXCELLENTImplicitly reveals feelings and thoughts through presentation of the experience. ● Makes the reader understand the abstract ideas underlying the reflection through use of specific detail. ● Shows deep insight through a natural flow of ideas and an effective conclusion. ● The paper demonstrates ability of the student to question their own biases, stereotypes, preconceptions, and/or assumptions and define new modes of thinking as a result.23 to >22 ptsPROFICIENTIs thoughtful, convincing, insightful, and exploratory. ● Reveals a strong connection between the course content and the assignments/ experience(s). ● Analyzes the assignments/ experience(s) by looking at more than one angle. ● Explores the course content from both personal and professional contexts. ● Achieves unity through a natural progression of ideas.22 to >19 ptsMARGINALIs limited to flimsy generalizations. Inconsistencies in logic and reasoning and a tendency to ramble. Does not explore the course content from a personal context.19 to >0 ptsUNACCEPTABLEUses only simple, obvious statements. ● Student makes attempts at applying the learning experience to understanding of self, others, and/or course concepts but fails to demonstrate depth of analysis. ● No attempt to demonstrate connections to previous learning or experience. | / 25 pts |
| USE OF REFLECTIVE WRITING STRATEGIESview longer description | 25 to >23 ptsEXCELLENTEffectively uses a variety of reflective writing strategies. ● The learning experience being reflected upon is relevant and meaningful to student and course learning objectives.23 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTUses reflective writing strategies to enhance reflection. ● Uses specific, concrete details to make the reflection clear to the reader. ● The learning experience being reflected upon is relevant and meaningful to student and course learning objectives.21 to >19 ptsMARGINALUses few reflective writing strategies. ● Uses some details and sensory language. ● Student makes attempts to demonstrate relevance to course objectives, but the relevance is unclear to the reader.19 to >0 ptsUNACCEPTABLEDoes not attempt to elaborate ideas or elaborates only through repetition of the initial statement. Reflection writing style does not move beyond description of the learning experience(s). Most of the reflection is irrelevant to student and/or course learning objectives. | / 25 pts |
| ADHERENCE TO APA WRITING STYLEview longer description | 25 to >23 ptsEXCELLENTPaper is free of distracting spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors; absent of fragments, comma splices, and run-ons. ● Few, if any, typing errors in paper. ● Meets APA formatting; paper is neat, 3-4 pgs., correctly assembled with professional look.23 to >21 ptsPROFICIENTEssay has few spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors allowing reader to follow ideas clearly. Very few fragments or run-ons. ● There may be a few minor typing errors in paper. ● Meets APA format and assignment requirements; paper is neat and correctly assembled.21 to >19 ptsMARGINALThere are some major and minor spelling, punctuation, and grammar errors in paper but writing style is clear enough to allow reader to progress though paper. ● Meets APA format; margins, spacing, and indentations are correct; less than 3 or more than 5 pages in length; paper is correctly assembled.19 to >0 ptsUNACCEPTABLEExcessive major and minor writing and/or typing errors throughout the paper. ● Spelling, punctuation, and grammatical errors create distraction, making reading difficult; fragments, comma splices, run-ons evident. ● Fails to follow APA format (incorrect margins, spacing and indentation) ● Writing is below graduate level mastery. | / 25 pts |
| Total Points: 0 | ||
